SCHOOL VISION: Meet AYP
GOAL: To see how using the Classroom Performance System affects the student scores for benchmark purposes.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Action Research Plan
It has been fun and interesting in designing my action research plan. I can't wait to see the results. It will be interesting to see if the technology increases the scores or not. I am nervous and overwhelmed at the same time. I am finding it difficult to get everything done! I have learned so much from all the reading about action research, and I am excited to put it into practice and see what kind of results come from it!
Goal: To see how using the Classroom Performance System effects the student scores for benchmark purposes.
Activities designed to achieve the objectives: All students are required to take the benchmark test every 6 weeks in all subject areas. I will compare scores, from students who are on the same academic level; one class will use the CPS system to enter their scores into the computer, while other classes will use a bubble sheet and answers will be scanned into the computer. All scores will be sent to Eduphoria Aware, which generates various reports of student scores. I will use the data to see if there are any differences between those who used the CPS and those who did not.
Resources & research tools needed: CPS system, CPS software with class information and benchmark questions loaded, link the CPS system with Eduphoria Aware, students and student scores.
Draft timeline for completion or implementation of activities: May 2012, we will have taken 4 or 5 benchmark tests; giving me 4 or 5 opportunities to gather data.
Persons responsible for implementation of the action research plan: Jana Dugas, help from Jana Cash (mentor, technology coach for our district), data from students in Johnna Brinkley’s and Amber Simmons’ class (4th grade at Vidor Elementary).
Process for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives: I plan to collect data from all subjects. Even though student data will be taken from 3 different classes and three different teachers, I believe the students are all being taught very similar. We all use the same curriculum, have similar teaching styles, and spend the same amount of time teaching the subjects tested. We all plan our lessons together to make sure our students are all on the same page. I will gather data after every benchmark from a sample size of about 3 above average students, 3 average students, 3 below average students, and 3 at-risk students. I plan to track their achievement, noting any increases or decreases in scores through out the school year. Some of the students will use the CPS system while others will use the paper and pencil system to record answers.
Assessment instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action research study: I will use the data from Eduphoria Aware; it reports student scores from the test.
Goal: To see how using the Classroom Performance System effects the student scores for benchmark purposes.
Activities designed to achieve the objectives: All students are required to take the benchmark test every 6 weeks in all subject areas. I will compare scores, from students who are on the same academic level; one class will use the CPS system to enter their scores into the computer, while other classes will use a bubble sheet and answers will be scanned into the computer. All scores will be sent to Eduphoria Aware, which generates various reports of student scores. I will use the data to see if there are any differences between those who used the CPS and those who did not.
Resources & research tools needed: CPS system, CPS software with class information and benchmark questions loaded, link the CPS system with Eduphoria Aware, students and student scores.
Draft timeline for completion or implementation of activities: May 2012, we will have taken 4 or 5 benchmark tests; giving me 4 or 5 opportunities to gather data.
Persons responsible for implementation of the action research plan: Jana Dugas, help from Jana Cash (mentor, technology coach for our district), data from students in Johnna Brinkley’s and Amber Simmons’ class (4th grade at Vidor Elementary).
Process for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives: I plan to collect data from all subjects. Even though student data will be taken from 3 different classes and three different teachers, I believe the students are all being taught very similar. We all use the same curriculum, have similar teaching styles, and spend the same amount of time teaching the subjects tested. We all plan our lessons together to make sure our students are all on the same page. I will gather data after every benchmark from a sample size of about 3 above average students, 3 average students, 3 below average students, and 3 at-risk students. I plan to track their achievement, noting any increases or decreases in scores through out the school year. Some of the students will use the CPS system while others will use the paper and pencil system to record answers.
Assessment instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action research study: I will use the data from Eduphoria Aware; it reports student scores from the test.
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Action Research
Action research. Until today those words didn’t mean a whole lot to me. After doing some reading, I have found that action research is something I should be doing in my job as a teacher. Action research is a way to improve your teaching, solving a problem, or both. It is a systematic process by which you pose a question about something you would like to improve, review literature on the topic, plan a strategy, and share what you learned. I think it will be very useful to use in my teaching as well as intervening in academic or behavioral situations – for students who are struggling. I already use a process similar to action research, but not as in depth. Action research is an intense, in-depth process that brings about positive change. I believe all teachers and administrators should be practicing action research. The possibilities are endless when this process is used. As an educator, we are encouraged to use “best practices” in our classrooms. Best practices are strategies that show exemplary results. In my opinion, it would be a best practice to use action research as we change the way we teach; preparing our student for STAAR, college, and 21st century learners.
Educational leaders can use blogs to collaborate, communicate, and support each other; even though they may be long distances away from each other. By blogging, you can share ideas and strategies. Learn what worked and what didn’t work. It allows you to reflect on your work and be intentional about what you do (Dana, 2007, p. 150).
Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: the principal as action researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Educational leaders can use blogs to collaborate, communicate, and support each other; even though they may be long distances away from each other. By blogging, you can share ideas and strategies. Learn what worked and what didn’t work. It allows you to reflect on your work and be intentional about what you do (Dana, 2007, p. 150).
Dana, N.F. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: the principal as action researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Course Reflection 5306
I envisioned that I would get an overview of what educational technology leadership was all about. I believe that this course has done just that. We studied everything from ethics, to technology plans, to TEKS. I think I achieved the outcomes that I envisioned and more. I did some things that were difficult, but necessary for my success. I also thought that I would learn a lot about how to do more things on the technology side. I learned how to create a blog and wiki as well as how to attend a web conference. There were some aspects that I didn’t know what to expect or envision, so a lot was new to me. It is hard to say if the actual course outcomes aligned with those I envisioned. I didn’t have a lot envisioned – I didn’t know what to expect. I know that I have learned a lot through this class and improved on the skills that I already had; as well as learning new skills.
The outcomes are somewhat relevant to the work I do in my school in that I am able to think more about incorporating technology into my lessons. I am more aware of what my students are doing on the Internet and how I can teach them about cyber-bullying, ethics, and safety. I also understand why the STaR Chart is important and that Texas has a long-range plan for technology. I used to fill out the STaR Chart because it was a requirement, but now it has meaning to me. I can see how our district is aligned and planning to meet technology goals. I would like to use blogs and wikis in my classroom, but there are strict rules against such use. I never used to think that those things had a place in a classroom, but now I see a need for them. I believe the things I have learned are being applied to how I teach.
There were some outcomes that I did not achieve. When I took some of the self-evaluations in Week 1, I realized that I was lacking in some of the areas. I thought that I would learn how to use certain things like Internet research, web-publishing skills, and graphics usage. Although there were lots of new things I learned, I had hope to touch on those previously listed above. I hope that I do learn those things that I don’t know a lot about. I don’t believe anything in the course prevented me from achieving them; they just weren’t addressed. I have not had time to do those things on my own, to teach myself. I do believe that I will learn how to do these things by the time I finish the program.
I think I was successful in carrying out the course assignments. I was able to complete them all to the best of my abilities and followed the rubrics for maximum points. I scored very well on most assignments. On one assignment, Week 3, I scored lower than all other assignments and was unsure why. I had followed all directions as stated in the assignment and read the rubric to make sure I had done everything correctly. I’m not sure what happened. I also struggled to upload my site-mentor agreement to my wikispace. It seemed like a simple task, but took me hours. I had a new computer, new printer/scanner and had never tried to upload a file to a wiki before. After trial and error, I learned how to do it. It was discouraging at first, but when I overcame the barrier, I felt awesome!
I learned a lot about myself and my attitude from this course. I learned that I achieve this goal and dream if I just tried. Long ago, I had envisioned that someday I would get a masters degree. I always had excuses and recently it seemed as if it would never happen. Through much thought and support from my family, I decided to just do it. I have always tried to keep a positive attitude, and this course has encouraged me to keep it up! I have learned and assessed where I am with my technology and leadership skills. I have also taken steps to improve those skills. I have also learned how to rely on others to reach my goal. I always try to do things on my own and don’t ask for help. I was required to secure a site-mentor and in the process I ended up with two of them! Never in my wildest dreams would I have done that on my own. The best thing is that they are both very open to helping me out. Both my mentors are knowledgeable in their areas and are going to teach me and encourage me to meet my goal.
The outcomes are somewhat relevant to the work I do in my school in that I am able to think more about incorporating technology into my lessons. I am more aware of what my students are doing on the Internet and how I can teach them about cyber-bullying, ethics, and safety. I also understand why the STaR Chart is important and that Texas has a long-range plan for technology. I used to fill out the STaR Chart because it was a requirement, but now it has meaning to me. I can see how our district is aligned and planning to meet technology goals. I would like to use blogs and wikis in my classroom, but there are strict rules against such use. I never used to think that those things had a place in a classroom, but now I see a need for them. I believe the things I have learned are being applied to how I teach.
There were some outcomes that I did not achieve. When I took some of the self-evaluations in Week 1, I realized that I was lacking in some of the areas. I thought that I would learn how to use certain things like Internet research, web-publishing skills, and graphics usage. Although there were lots of new things I learned, I had hope to touch on those previously listed above. I hope that I do learn those things that I don’t know a lot about. I don’t believe anything in the course prevented me from achieving them; they just weren’t addressed. I have not had time to do those things on my own, to teach myself. I do believe that I will learn how to do these things by the time I finish the program.
I think I was successful in carrying out the course assignments. I was able to complete them all to the best of my abilities and followed the rubrics for maximum points. I scored very well on most assignments. On one assignment, Week 3, I scored lower than all other assignments and was unsure why. I had followed all directions as stated in the assignment and read the rubric to make sure I had done everything correctly. I’m not sure what happened. I also struggled to upload my site-mentor agreement to my wikispace. It seemed like a simple task, but took me hours. I had a new computer, new printer/scanner and had never tried to upload a file to a wiki before. After trial and error, I learned how to do it. It was discouraging at first, but when I overcame the barrier, I felt awesome!
I learned a lot about myself and my attitude from this course. I learned that I achieve this goal and dream if I just tried. Long ago, I had envisioned that someday I would get a masters degree. I always had excuses and recently it seemed as if it would never happen. Through much thought and support from my family, I decided to just do it. I have always tried to keep a positive attitude, and this course has encouraged me to keep it up! I have learned and assessed where I am with my technology and leadership skills. I have also taken steps to improve those skills. I have also learned how to rely on others to reach my goal. I always try to do things on my own and don’t ask for help. I was required to secure a site-mentor and in the process I ended up with two of them! Never in my wildest dreams would I have done that on my own. The best thing is that they are both very open to helping me out. Both my mentors are knowledgeable in their areas and are going to teach me and encourage me to meet my goal.
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Blog Posting #3
The National Educational Technology Plan has goals set in place. This is great because every plan needs a goal. The goal in mind is to raise the number of people in the U.S. who have a two or four year college degree, and make sure that all high school students who graduate are prepared for college and careers. There five strategies to get there. The first strategy is learning. This strategy talks about how we must personalize their learning. We can do that by figuring our what kind of learners they are, what they need to learn, how will they learn best (in large groups, small groups, etc.), and technology resources should be available for them to utilize. The community and outside leaders should be involved in their learning as well. The second strategy is assessment. In summary, technology based assessments that use higher-level thinking skills as well as improve student performance. The third strategy stated is teaching. It talks about using a “connected teaching model”, where classrooms and teachers are connected to technology learning tools that will enable students to be self-directed learners. Online learning communities are used. Professional development is no longer necessary because teachers will be collaborating with other teachers and sharing information. Strategy four is infrastructure. We should provide teachers and students with the resources they require; everything from software to people. In the fifth strategy, productivity, the goal is to repurpose and rethink our system for educating students. It suggests that students not be grouped by age but by learning pace and content. Also, online learning is suggested as a way to increase the school year or amount of time devoted to learning. We should redesign the way we think about school and individualize learning to fit the student. Following these strategies would certainly put the U.S. on the right path to reaching the goal that was previously stated.
Jana Dugas EDLD 5306 Section 8038 August 31, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
